Posted by Hillel on Oct 11, 2007 in Planning Poker, Project Planning, Scrum | 1 comment
We created and produced decks of planning poker cards.
Right now, we’re not set-up to sell them yet, so… if you ask nicely, we’ll send you a deck.
More info here.
(The card on the right is the "I need a break!" card.
the backs of the cards have our AgileCMMI logo and *this* site’s URL.)
Copyright Agile CMMI Blog
CMMI, and SCAMPI are registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office by Carnegie Mellon University.
WordPress Theme by: Wood Street, Inc.
Facebook Twitter
Hi Hillel
The organization I work for is CMMi L3. For maintenance projects, we currently use a parametric method to estimate size, complexity and effort. We have implemented improvements to this technique, but still, there is large variability on the performance of this method (when compared against actual effort, which we record).
There are strong initiatives to move to a more agile approach, including effort estimation using planning poker, but we don´t want it to turn into a total-guessing and whole-dependable-on-persons technique
I understand that (out of the box) it covers PP, because attributes (size, complexity) are estimated, and later effort get derived from them
However I´d like your comments on maturity level 3 practices, such as Generic Pratice GP 3.2 (Collect Process Related Experiences), IPM SP 1.2 (Use Organizational Process Assets for Planning Project Activities)
Thanks for your comments
Juan Carlos