Posted by Hillel on Nov 5, 2007 in HMLA, High Maturity, Oral Exam, lead appraiser | Comments Off
Well, I’d like to say it was "nothing", but really, I was sweating bullets!
Since I consider readers of this blog to be among my more friendly professional acquaintances, I thought I’d let you in on something that has not yet been released to the general public.
See here for an as-yet to be released announcement article/press-release-style about my becoming an SEI-Certified High Maturity Lead Appraiser.
The actual release might change slightly as the PR folks work on it, but you’ll get the gist.
One fun thing that had to be left on the editing floor was a quote from a technical member of one of my client’s staff when he asked, "… how did you get into this field? I mean, you actually have a personality!"
The techie was worried I might be offended, but I thought it was pretty funny, and so did PR… but it didn’t make the cut for the article.
Here’s some insight into what it was like:
The oral exam gives high marks for noting very specific terms, and is structured in some way (like the CMMI model itself) that lends itself to recursiveness (not exactly redundancy). Towards the last half hour, my seasonal cold, my lack of sleep, and my indigestion had all caught-up with me. My brain was empty, I couldn’t tell what I’d said previously and what I still didn’t say and I couldn’t pull certain ideas from my brain to save my life.
Last impressions are often just as memorable as first impressions. In my case, I recall that I nailed the earlier parts of the exam to the wall. Not just hitting the target but obliterating it. But when the end drew near, I felt like I’d lost that clarity of thought, that I was going in circles. Not knowing when I’d said enough or when I was digging my own grave, I started searching for ideas on the blank neutral hotel walls hoping my eye-movement would stimulate new recollections to re-open my log-jammed head to what I knew I knew.
At best, I felt I was squarely on the fence. I’m grateful to the guys who administered the exam for translating my verbal spaghetti into thoughts that must’ve communicated my intentions even though at the time I felt my 22-month old had more effective speech patterns.
Posted by Hillel on Oct 23, 2007 in Crash Course, Jeanne, NDIA | Comments Off
I’ve been delivering this class I’ve been calling the CMMI Crash Course™ (What the SEI won’t teach you) for several years.
For reasons I’ve as yet not taken the time to figure out, I’d never advertised it, never had a web page on Entinex.com for it, and only really made it public at the NDIA CMMI conference last year.
Well, my Chief Executive Genie (responsible for marketing research and homeland operations… a.k.a. my wife Jeanne), pointed out that not hello.World’ing the course was a great disservice to the industry.
She pointed out that if part of the Entinex corporate mission (and my personal quest) was to better educate folks about CMMI, and that this education was necessary to help more organizations understand how to adopt CMMI, and that all this was just prerequisites for eliminating the gap (perceived or real) between CMMI and Agile… well… people should know about it!
Until now, other than presenting at the aforementioned conference, my only deliveries of the Crash Course™ have been to prospects and clients.
SO…
Now you know. I’ve got this Crash Course thing I do. It’s pretty decent. Teaches a whole bunch of stuff in a short time (4 hours). Conservatively, it could otherwise take over US$30k, about 4 weeks time over several years to gain what I’ve condensed into half a day of not-so-boring stuff.
I’ve had SEI folks sit in and they loved it. See… even though I say "What the SEI Won’t Teach You" it’s not that they don’t, really… it’s that they just do it in a very specific way that… well… doesn’t connect with lots of people on the things they care about. That’s just what happens when you’ve got a VERY large audience to satisfy. It’s also symptomatic of having to toe a very fine but deep line on what they can/can’t say.
Really… of course the SEI teaches this stuff… how else would I get it? (OK, unfair question… I’m a CMMI geek… I’d probably get it some way.)
Regardless… the AgileCMMI point to this is simply that training really does need to account for the needs of the participants, must be relevant to their projects and processes and must be timely so as to make a positive difference in decision-making. All-too-often I encounter perfunctory "process" training that has a worse effect than being bad. It foments cynicism and dissent for process improvement where the organization’s only goal is painfully clear: prove you had training or the appraisal won’t look good.
More people should know the content of the Crash Course™. It would make their CMMI (and probably Agile) lives easier.
If interested, I’ll send you last-year’s slides. (This year’s are way better.)
[Yes, that was a shameless plug.]
I hope to be presenting this year’s version at the NDIA conference again.
If you visit Entinex.com, you’ll also read about my Crash Course™ plans for 2008.
Posted by Hillel on Oct 16, 2007 in Thanks | Comments Off
This entry is just a public thank you shout-out to the folks at Computer Aid, Inc. "The World Leader in IT Process and Productivity", for bothering themselves to notice this blog in their recent IT Metrics and Productivity Journal issue.
I and everyone working to close the gap between CMMI and Agile appreciate your contribution to spreading the word.
Copyright Agile CMMI Blog
CMMI, and SCAMPI are registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office by Carnegie Mellon University.
WordPress Theme by: Wood Street, Inc.
Facebook Twitter